Catholic Commentary
Asa's War with Baasha and Alliance with Syria (Part 2)
24Asa slept with his fathers, and was buried with his fathers in his father David’s city; and Jehoshaphat his son reigned in his place.
1 Kings 15:24 records the death and burial of King Asa of Judah after a forty-one-year reign, using the standard Deuteronomistic formula "slept with his fathers" to describe his passing. His burial in Jerusalem's royal tomb and the succession of his son Jehoshaphat affirm the continuity and covenantal promise of the Davidic dynasty.
Even the best kings die the same death as everyone else—and that's where God's covenant promises shine brightest.
Typological and Spiritual Senses Typologically, the Davidic royal burial and dynastic succession point toward Christ. The Church Fathers read the City of David as a type of the Church and ultimately of heaven, the place where the true King is finally gathered. The "sleep" of death takes on new meaning in the light of Easter: what was a euphemism in the Old Testament becomes eschatological reality in Christ, who sleeps in death and rises (cf. 1 Cor 15:20, "the first-fruits of those who have fallen asleep"). Every Davidic king who "sleeps" anticipates the one King who sleeps only to rise, transforming death itself.
From a Catholic perspective, this verse sits at the intersection of three great theological themes: the theology of death, the theology of covenant promise, and the theology of the Davidic Messiah.
Death as "Sleep": The Catholic Church draws on this very language in her liturgy and theology. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "in death, the separation of the soul from the body, the human body decays and the soul goes to meet God, while awaiting its reunion with its glorified body" (CCC 997). The "sleep" language reflects the Christian hope of resurrection — death is not annihilation but a passage. St. John Chrysostom, preaching on this formula throughout Kings and Samuel, argued that the Old Testament use of "sleep" was a divinely-planted seed of resurrection hope planted in Israel's consciousness long before the explicit doctrine was revealed (Homilies on Matthew, 36).
Covenant Continuity: Pope Benedict XVI, in Jesus of Nazareth, emphasizes that the Davidic covenant is the structural backbone of Old Testament hope, the framework into which Christ steps as the definitive fulfillment. Each succession notice in Kings is a link in the chain of promise. The Catechism affirms: "The royal messianic hope could only be fulfilled by a new David" (CCC 711). Asa's burial in David's city and Jehoshaphat's succession are thus not mere history but the ongoing narration of God's faithfulness to His sworn Word.
The Church Fathers on Davidic Typology: St. Augustine (City of God, Book XVII) reads the entire history of the Davidic kings as a sustained type of the two cities — the earthly and the heavenly Jerusalem — with each king serving as a partial, imperfect icon of the true King who is Christ. The flaws of Asa (his failure to remove the high places, his late-life political fear) remind Augustine that no earthly king can bear the full weight of the messianic office; only Christ fully embodies kingship in justice and holiness.
Asa's death notice confronts contemporary Catholics with the sober reality that even a life of genuine, courageous faith — one that tears down idols and reforms institutions — ends in the same common mortality as every other life. Asa could not save himself. This is not discouraging but liberating: our standing before God is not finally secured by the sum of our reforms and achievements, but by the covenant fidelity of God who buries His servants in the City of His promise and raises up successors.
Practically, this verse invites Catholics to reflect on two things. First, how we prepare for death: Asa, the Chronicler tells us, prepared his own tomb (2 Chr 16:14). The Catholic tradition of memento mori — keeping death in mind — is not morbid but clarifying. Praying with the Office of the Dead, planning a Catholic funeral, or simply asking "am I living in a way I would not be ashamed of at death?" are concrete applications. Second, the importance of succession: Asa raised Jehoshaphat to be a good king. What faith are we handing on to those who come after us — our children, godchildren, students? The covenant continues through faithful transmission. Parents, teachers, and catechists are, in a small but real way, ensuring that the line of promise continues in their generation.
Commentary
1 Kings 15:24 — Verse-by-Verse Commentary
"Asa slept with his fathers" The phrase "slept with his fathers" (Hebrew: wayyiškab ʿim-ʾăbōtāyw) is the standard Deuteronomistic death formula applied to the kings of Israel and Judah (cf. 1 Kgs 2:10; 11:43; 14:20). It is not merely a euphemism for death but a theologically loaded expression rooted in the covenant community's understanding of death. In the Ancient Near Eastern and Israelite worldview, to "sleep with one's fathers" implies a kind of continued union with the ancestral community — a belonging that transcends the grave. Asa's death closes a reign of forty-one years (1 Kgs 15:10), notable for its religious reforms: the removal of male cult prostitutes, the clearance of idols, and the deposition of his own mother Maacah from her position as queen mother because of her idolatry (1 Kgs 15:11–13). Yet even Asa, this reforming king, is not without fault — the high places were not taken away (v. 14), and in his later years he allied with Ben-hadad of Syria by stripping the Temple treasury (vv. 18–19), and was rebuked by the prophet Hanani for trusting in a foreign king rather than God (2 Chr 16:7–10). The death formula thus carries a note of sober realism: even good kings remain mortal, mixed, and insufficient.
"and was buried with his fathers in his father David's city" The specificity of burial location is not incidental. To be buried in the City of David — Jerusalem — in the royal tomb of the Davidic dynasty is a mark of covenantal honor, a sign that one belongs to the line through which God's oath to David (2 Sam 7:12–16) is being fulfilled. The Chronicler elaborates that Asa was buried in a tomb he had hewn for himself in the City of David, accompanied by spices and a great fire in his honor (2 Chr 16:14). The royal burial ground thus functions as a visible, earthly testimony to the covenant: these kings are gathered together in death as a community of promise, awaiting the final fulfillment of what God swore to David. Burial in this sacred ground implicitly contrasts with the fate of kings of the northern kingdom (Israel), whose dynasties are cut off and who do not rest in covenant security.
"and Jehoshaphat his son reigned in his place" This succession notice is far more than a bureaucratic transition. In the Deuteronomistic theology of Kings, the orderly succession of a son on his father's throne in the Davidic line is itself a sign of divine favor and covenantal fidelity. God had promised David: "I will raise up your offspring after you... and I will establish his kingdom" (2 Sam 7:12). Each Davidic succession, however flawed the individual king, is a partial and provisional fulfillment of that promise, pointing forward toward the one Son of David whose kingdom will have no end. Jehoshaphat will himself prove to be a reforming king (1 Kgs 22:41–50), continuing the generally positive trajectory of the Judahite line, in contrast to the turbulent and violent successions of the northern kingdom.