© 2026 Sacred Texts
All Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).
Catholic Commentary
Peace Treaty with Bacchides; Jonathan Judges Israel
70Jonathan learned of this and sent ambassadors to him, to the end that they should make peace with him, and that he should restore to them the captives.71He accepted the thing, and did according to his words, and swore to him that he would not seek his harm all the days of his life.72He restored to him the captives which he had taken before out of the land of Judah, and he returned and departed into his own land, and didn’t come any more into their borders.73Thus the sword ceased from Israel. Jonathan lived at Michmash. Jonathan began to judge the people; and he destroyed the ungodly out of Israel.
Peace isn't the absence of the sword—it's the hard work of restoring captives and purifying your own community at the same time.
After years of devastating warfare, Jonathan takes the bold initiative of seeking peace with the Seleucid general Bacchides, securing the return of Jewish captives and a sworn truce. With the sword at last withdrawn from Israel, Jonathan settles at Michmash and begins his dual vocation as judge and purifier of the people — governing with authority while rooting out corruption from within the community. This passage marks a pivotal transition from military survival to the slow, patient work of civil and spiritual renewal.
Verse 70 — Jonathan's diplomatic initiative: The verse opens with a striking reversal of the narrative's momentum. The previous chapters have chronicled relentless Seleucid aggression and the decimation of the Maccabean forces. Yet it is Jonathan who initiates peace — not from weakness, but from shrewd assessment of the moment. Bacchides' own troops had suffered losses (9:66–69), and Jonathan reads this as the opening for negotiation. The phrase "sent ambassadors" recalls the formal diplomatic protocols of the ancient Near East; Jonathan acts not merely as a guerrilla chieftain but as a legitimate political authority representing his people. The goal is twofold: peace ("שׁלום," shalom in its political dimension) and the repatriation of captives — a restorative justice that binds the community back together.
Verse 71 — Bacchides' oath: The general's acceptance is sealed with a solemn oath — "he swore to him that he would not seek his harm all the days of his life." In the ancient world, such oaths invoked divine witness and carried the weight of sacred obligation. The fact that the narrator records Bacchides swearing on Jonathan's terms signals that the Hasmonean leader has achieved something unprecedented: a Seleucid commander bound by oath to respect an Israelite leader's life. This is not merely a ceasefire but a covenantal recognition, however partial, of Jonathan's standing.
Verse 72 — The return of captives and the withdrawal: The restoration of the captives taken "out of the land of Judah" is loaded with theological resonance. In the Hebrew imagination, captivity in foreign hands is a sign of covenantal rupture (cf. Deut 28:41); their return is thus a foretaste of redemption. Bacchides' departure and the guarantee that "he didn't come any more into their borders" fulfills the deepest longing of a people whose land had been violated for decades. The phrase signals not merely political relief but a kind of territorial sanctification — the holy land breathing again.
Verse 73 — "The sword ceased from Israel": This phrase is one of the most theologically weighty in the book. It echoes the Deuteronomistic language of rest granted by God after faithful leadership (cf. Josh 11:23; Judg 3:11). The author of 1 Maccabees is a sophisticated theological historian: the sword's ceasing is not attributed to Bacchides' generosity but stands as a declarative statement about Israel's condition — implying divine providence at work through human agency. Jonathan's settlement at Michmash is significant: this was a site of Saul's early military glory (1 Sam 13–14), subtly investing Jonathan with royal and Davidic undertones.
Catholic tradition illuminates this passage at several levels. First, the theology of peace: the Catechism teaches that peace is not merely the absence of war but "the tranquillity of order" (tranquillitas ordinis, citing Augustine, City of God XIX.13; CCC 2304). Jonathan's peace is precisely this — not a passive ceasefire but an ordered restoration of justice, including the return of the captives. The Church's social teaching (cf. Gaudium et Spes 78) insists that genuine peace requires both justice and truth, which Jonathan embodies by combining diplomatic skill with interior reform of the community.
Second, Jonathan's dual role as judge and purifier prefigures the pastoral office of the Church. The Church Fathers, particularly St. Ambrose (De Officiis I.35), praised leaders who combine external governance with the reformation of morals — precisely what Jonathan does at Michmash. The bishop, in Catholic tradition, is similarly charged with both governing the faithful and guarding doctrinal and moral purity.
Third, the return of captives carries typological weight. Origen (Homilies on Exodus) and later St. Augustine saw Israel's captives as figures of souls held in bondage by sin, whose liberation points toward the redemptive work of Christ. The Catechism echoes this: "The Old Testament is full of figures announcing the liberation that Christ will accomplish" (CCC 1217). Jonathan's repatriation of prisoners thus foreshadows Christ's proclamation of "liberty to captives" (Luke 4:18).
Finally, the "sword ceasing" as a fruit of righteous leadership recalls the Magisterium's consistent teaching that just authority, properly exercised, is a participation in divine governance (CCC 1897–1899), oriented ultimately toward the peace of the Kingdom.
Jonathan's actions in these verses offer a demanding model for Catholics navigating conflict — whether in families, parishes, workplaces, or civic life. His initiative in seeking peace is not passivity or capitulation; it is a strategic act of courage that required him to approach a powerful adversary from a position of apparent weakness. Contemporary Catholics are called to this same courageous peacemaking: the willingness to initiate reconciliation, to negotiate without surrendering principle, and to secure justice for the vulnerable (the captives) as part of any genuine peace.
But the passage's sharpest challenge comes in verse 73: Jonathan did not stop at external peace. He turned inward and "destroyed the ungodly out of Israel." For today's Catholic, this is a call to personal and communal examination of conscience. External reconciliation — with a difficult colleague, a divided parish, an estranged family member — must be accompanied by interior reform. We must ask: what "ungodliness" within our own communities, habits, or hearts undermines the peace we seek to build? Pope Francis' Evangelii Gaudium (§24) insists that authentic reform begins with conversion of heart. Jonathan's dual vocation — peacemaker and reformer — is every Catholic's vocation.
The phrase "Jonathan began to judge the people" formally inaugurates the second great office of the Hasmoneans alongside the high priesthood — the role of judge, recalling the pre-monarchic leaders who governed Israel as God's appointed instruments (cf. the Book of Judges). The final clause, "he destroyed the ungodly out of Israel," is jarring to modern ears but is a deliberate theological marker: interior purification of the community is inseparable from its external liberation. Jonathan's mission is not merely political independence but holiness — the restoration of the covenant people to covenant fidelity. The "ungodly" (anomoi, literally "the lawless ones") were likely the Hellenizing Jews who had collaborated with the occupiers and abandoned the Torah. True peace, the author insists, demands not only the withdrawal of foreign enemies but the reformation of the community itself.