Catholic Commentary
David Arrives at the Camp and Hears Goliath's Taunt (Part 1)
17Jesse said to David his son, “Now take for your brothers an ephah of this parched grain and these ten loaves, and carry them quickly to the camp to your brothers;18and bring these ten cheeses to the captain of their thousand; and see how your brothers are doing, and bring back news.”19Now Saul, and they, and all the men of Israel were in the valley of Elah, fighting with the Philistines.20David rose up early in the morning and left the sheep with a keeper, and took the provisions and went, as Jesse had commanded him. He came to the place of the wagons as the army which was going out to the fight shouted for the battle.21Israel and the Philistines put the battle in array, army against army.22David left his baggage in the hand of the keeper of the baggage and ran to the army, and came and greeted his brothers.23As he talked with them, behold, the champion, the Philistine of Gath, Goliath by name, came up out of the ranks of the Philistines, and said the same words; and David heard them.
1 Samuel 17:17–24 describes David's obedient errand to deliver food to his soldier brothers at the valley of Elah, where he arrives to find the Israelite army paralyzed by fear of the Philistine giant Goliath. The passage establishes David's character through his practical faithfulness and contrasts his hearing of Goliath's taunt with Israel's terrified flight.
A shepherd boy arrives to deliver bread and stumbles into his calling—because God's plans move through obedience to the ordinary, not escape from it.
Commentary
1 Samuel 17:17 — Jesse's Commission: Jesse instructs David to carry an ephah of parched grain and ten loaves to his brothers — staple, practical provisions for soldiers in the field. This detail roots the story firmly in the rhythms of ordinary family life: David is not a soldier but a shepherd-errand boy, carrying food rather than a sword. The parched grain (qali) and bread were classic travel rations in ancient Israel (cf. Ruth 2:14). Jesse's injunction to go "quickly" underscores that this is framed as a mundane domestic task. The narrator's insistence on the ordinariness is theologically important: the stage for Israel's deliverance is set not by military planning but by a father's care for his sons.
1 Samuel 17:18 — Cheeses for the Commander: The ten cheeses sent to "the captain of their thousand" reveal Jesse's social awareness and respect for military hierarchy — a gift establishing goodwill with the commanding officer overseeing his sons. The instruction to "see how your brothers are doing and bring back news" (literally, "take their pledge" — 'arubatam — a token confirming their welfare) emphasizes David's role here as family messenger, not warrior. He is being sent to look, not to fight.
1 Samuel 17:19 — The Narrator's Aside: The narrator interrupts Jesse's speech with a parenthetical clarification for the reader: Saul's army is in the valley of Elah, "fighting with the Philistines." The valley of Elah (modern Wadi es-Sant) was a critical strategic corridor into the Judean hill country. The phrase "fighting with the Philistines" is almost ironic given what the next verse reveals — no actual fighting is taking place; the armies are locked in a standoff of fear.
1 Samuel 17:20 — Obedient Departure: David's response is immediate and complete: he rises early, secures the flock with a keeper, and sets out exactly "as Jesse had commanded him." This verse is deliberately structured to highlight David's faithful obedience in small things. He does not leave the sheep unguarded — a detail that reveals his conscientious character. "He came to the place of the wagons (ha-ma'agal)," the baggage encampment at the rear of the army, just as the battle cry went up. His arrival is providentially timed; he steps into the story at precisely the moment of maximum tension.
1 Samuel 17:21 — Armies in Array: The two armies are drawn up in formal battle formation, face to face. This description of symmetrical military arrays heightens the dramatic irony: two forces poised for combat, yet the confrontation has become ritualized and static — every morning and evening Goliath taunts, and every morning and evening Israel retreats. The arrangement signals that this is not ordinary warfare but a contest of representatives, a form of single combat (monomachia) known across the ancient Near East, in which the outcome of battle is determined by two champions.
Verses 22–23 — David Hears the Taunt: David leaves his provisions with the baggage-keeper — showing again his practical responsibility — and "ran" to the battle line to greet his brothers. The verb "ran" (wayyarots) will recur when David charges Goliath (v. 48), forming a deliberate literary bracket: he runs toward the challenge from his very first moment at the camp. As he speaks with his brothers, Goliath steps forward and delivers his daily taunt. The narrator is precise: David heard it (wayyishma' David). This hearing is the hinge-point of the entire narrative. Hearing is not passive; it demands a response, and David's response will be utterly unlike that of every other Israelite.
1 Samuel 17:24 — The Terror of Israel: The contrast is stark and intentional: "All the men of Israel, when they saw the man, fled from him and were terrified." The verb wayyanu' (they fled) describes a panicked, disorderly retreat. Israel sees only the giant; David will hear the blasphemy — a difference of perception that explains the difference in courage. The fear of Israel is not cowardice alone but a failure of theological vision: they have forgotten who fights for them. The typological resonance is profound: just as Israel feared at the Red Sea and forgot the Lord's power (Exodus 14:10), so here they forget that the battle belongs to the Lord.
Typological / Spiritual Sense: In the Catholic tradition's fourfold sense of Scripture, this passage operates richly on the allegorical level. David arriving unsolicited, bearing gifts of bread, entering the camp of a terrified people to confront the enemy they cannot face — this prefigures Christ's Incarnation. As St. Augustine notes in City of God, David is a pre-eminent type (figura) of Christ the King. Just as David comes not as a warrior expected by men but as a youth with bread, Christ comes not in the power the world anticipated but in humility, bearing the Bread of Life. The parched grain and loaves given to the soldiers and the cheeses offered to the commander suggest the eucharistic pattern of Christ who feeds his people in the midst of spiritual warfare. Gregory the Great (Moralia in Job) reads the giant's daily taunt as the voice of the devil's perpetual challenge to the soul, which paralyzes those who hear it with merely human ears but is overcome by the one who listens with faith.
Catholic Commentary
Catholic tradition illuminates this passage in several interconnected ways.
Providence working through the ordinary: The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "God's providence works also through the actions of creatures" (CCC §306). Jesse's domestic errand is not incidental to God's plan — it is God's plan. There is no angelic intervention, no dramatic divine summons: David is simply obedient to his father, rises early, and goes where he is told. This is the consistent Catholic teaching on vocation: the path of holiness runs through ordinary duties faithfully performed. St. Thérèse of Lisieux's "little way" finds its ancient precedent in David the errand boy.
The typology of David and Christ: The Church Fathers unanimously read David as a type of Christ. St. Justin Martyr (Dialogue with Trypho, ch. 103) and St. Irenaeus (Adversus Haereses, III.21) both treat David's anointing and subsequent trials as foreshadowing the Messiah. Here specifically, David's arrival at the camp bearing bread — unexpected, unhonored, a "shepherd-son" rather than a soldier — typifies Christ's Incarnation: the Son of God entering the camp of fallen humanity not in the guise of a conquering general but in humility, bearing himself as the Bread of Life.
Hearing versus seeing: The contrast between Israel's seeing (and fleeing) and David's hearing (and responding) carries deep theological weight consonant with Catholic emphasis on fides ex auditu — "faith comes by hearing" (Romans 10:17). To see Goliath is to see only the problem; to hear his words is to perceive the blasphemy against the living God, which awakens the response of faith. The Second Vatican Council's Dei Verbum (§21) underscores that Scripture is the living voice of God; those who hear it rightly are moved to action no merely empirical sight can produce.
For Today
Most Catholics are not called to slay giants. They are called — like David in these verses — to do the next faithful thing: rise early, care for what is entrusted to them, carry the bread, obey the father, run to greet the brothers. The extraordinary is reached through the ordinary. This passage challenges the contemporary Catholic tendency to wait for a dramatic divine intervention or a clear supernatural sign before committing to action. David didn't know he was walking toward the defining moment of his life — he thought he was making a delivery.
More pointedly: verse 24 describes men who could see the threat perfectly well and were paralyzed by it. Many Catholics today similarly see the challenges facing the Church, the family, and the culture with great clarity — and are nonetheless immobilized by fear. David's difference was not superior eyesight but a habit of hearing: he had spent years in the fields listening for the voice of God (Psalm 23 comes from precisely this period of his life). The spiritual discipline of lectio divina, of Eucharistic adoration, of the Daily Office — these are the practices that train Catholic ears to hear what Israel missed, and to run when everyone else retreats.
Cross-References