Catholic Commentary
Joash's Reign Begins Under Jehoiada's Guidance
1Joash was seven years old when he began to reign, and he reigned forty years in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Zibiah, of Beersheba.2Joash did that which was right in Yahweh’s eyes all the days of Jehoiada the priest.3Jehoiada took for him two wives, and he became the father of sons and daughters.
2 Chronicles 24:1–3 describes King Joash's ascension to the throne at age seven following Queen Athaliah's assassination, his forty-year reign, and his mother Zibiah's lineage from Beersheba. Joash performs righteous deeds during the days of Priest Jehoiada, who arranges his marriages and secures the Davidic succession through his sons and daughters.
A king can do right only as long as someone righteous stands beside him—but that borrowed virtue collapses the moment he stands alone.
2 Chronicles 24:1 — A Child King, Forty Years, and a Mother from Beersheba
Joash (also spelled Jehoash) ascends the throne at the remarkable age of seven, following one of the most turbulent episodes in Judah's royal history: the murderous usurpation of Queen Athaliah, who had attempted to exterminate the Davidic line (2 Chr 22:10–12). That Joash survived at all is itself a near-miraculous preservation of the Davidic covenant, orchestrated through the courageous concealment carried out by Jehosheba and Jehoiada in the Temple (2 Chr 22:11). His forty-year reign deliberately echoes the reigns of David and Solomon—both also reigned forty years (1 Kgs 2:11; 11:42)—inviting the reader to hope for a Davidic restoration. The mention of his mother Zibiah of Beersheba is not merely genealogical. Beersheba, the southernmost city of Israel, carries deep covenantal resonance: it is where Abraham and Isaac made their oaths (Gen 21:31–33; 26:23–33) and where God appeared to the patriarchs. Her origin quietly signals that the king's maternal roots lie in the heartland of the covenant people, far from the Phoenician corruption that had infected the dynasty through Ahab's line.
2 Chronicles 24:2 — Righteousness Conditioned on Priestly Mentorship
The Chronicler's verdict on Joash is carefully worded and critically qualified: he "did that which was right in Yahweh's eyes all the days of Jehoiada the priest." This subordinate clause is not incidental—it is the theological hinge of the entire chapter. The Chronicler, writing with didactic intent for post-exilic Israel, is concerned not merely with what kings do, but why they do it and under what conditions righteousness flourishes or collapses. Joash's goodness is real, but it is derivative and dependent. It does not yet spring from an internalized, personal covenant fidelity. The implicit contrast with Jehoiada himself is instructive: the priest's righteousness will be shown to be robust and unconditional, while the king's proves fragile. This verse is the Chronicler's way of setting up the devastating reversal in vv. 17–22, where, after Jehoiada's death, Joash abandons the Temple and even orders the stoning of Jehoiada's own son, Zechariah. The moral portrait here is one of formation that never became transformation.
2 Chronicles 24:3 — Jehoiada Arranges Joash's Marriages
The detail that Jehoiada "took for him two wives" is striking: it is the priest, not the king, who exercises this domestic authority. This underscores the extent of Jehoiada's guardianship—it is total, encompassing not only liturgical and political spheres but also the most intimate dimensions of royal life. The Chronicler's note that "he became the father of sons and daughters" signals the fulfillment of dynastic continuity, a matter of acute anxiety given Athaliah's attempt to annihilate Davidic heirs. The two wives (rather than the polygamous excess associated with Solomon) suggest a moderated, priest-ordered household. Typologically, the priest who establishes the king's household and secures the royal lineage prefigures the role of the Church as the guardian of the Christian family—establishing the conditions under which covenant life is transmitted to the next generation.
Catholic tradition reads the relationship between Joash and Jehoiada through the lens of the inseparability of priestly and royal authority—a theme central to the Church's understanding of the two powers and, more profoundly, to the typological relationship between the Old Covenant priesthood and the Church's own priestly office.
The Catechism teaches that "the baptized, by regeneration and the anointing of the Holy Spirit, are consecrated as a spiritual house and a holy priesthood" (CCC 1268), but it also affirms that the ordained priesthood has a distinct role in forming the faithful for their royal vocation. The dynamic between Jehoiada and Joash dramatizes precisely this: the priest does not replace the king, but without the priest's forming influence, the king's righteousness cannot be sustained.
St. Ambrose of Milan, writing to Emperor Theodosius after the Thessalonica massacre, embodied this same Jehoiada-like courage—the priest who stands beside and corrects the king for the king's own salvation. He wrote: "The emperor is within the Church, not above it" (Sermo contra Auxentium, 36). Joash's dependence on Jehoiada illustrates what happens when the king is within that priestly shelter, and his later apostasy illustrates what happens when he steps outside it.
The Church Fathers also noted the typological weight of the child-king rescued from death and hidden in the Temple until his appointed time. Origen and later commentators saw in Joash a faint image of Christ Himself—the true Davidic King, hidden from the murderous powers of this world (Herod, as Athaliah), sheltered in the Temple of God's own purposes, until revealed at the proper moment to reign. The forty-year reign reinforces this Mosaic and Davidic typology, linking Joash to the great leaders through whom God sustained His covenant people.
The conditional clause of verse 2—righteousness sustained only "all the days of Jehoiada"—is one of the most searching questions this passage puts to contemporary Catholics: Is my faith my own, or does it depend entirely on external scaffolding? Many Catholics practice their faith faithfully while surrounded by a strong parish community, a devout spouse, or a formative Catholic school—only to drift significantly when those supports are removed. Joash is not a hypocrite; his virtue under Jehoiada is genuine. But it is not yet rooted.
This passage calls Catholics to honest self-examination: Are you seeking formation that becomes transformation? Jehoiada's role points to the irreplaceable value of spiritual direction, regular engagement with a confessor, and submission to the Church's teaching authority—not as substitutes for personal faith, but as the priestly structures through which personal faith is deepened and made resilient.
Parents and godparents should also hear verse 3: Jehoiada actively orders Joash's household. Those who care for the young have a responsibility not only to teach doctrine but to order the conditions—family prayer, sacramental life, a Catholic home culture—within which virtue can take root deeply enough to survive adversity.