Catholic Commentary
The Siege of Gazara and the Death of Timotheus
32Timotheus himself fled into a stronghold called Gazara, a fortress of great strength, where Chaereas was in command.33Then Maccabaeus and his men were glad and laid siege to the fortress for four days.34Those who were within, trusting in the strength of the place, blasphemed exceedingly, and hurled out impious words.35But at dawn of the fifth day, certain young men of Maccabaeus’ company, inflamed with anger because of the blasphemies, assaulted the wall with masculine force and with furious anger, and cut down whoever came in their way.36Others climbing up in the same way, while the enemies were distracted with those who had made their way within, set fire to the towers, and kindled fires that burned the blasphemers alive, while others broke open the gates, and, having given entrance to the rest of the band, occupied the city.37They killed Timotheus, who was hidden in a cistern, and his brother Chaereas, and Apollophanes.38When they had accomplished these things, they blessed the Lord with hymns and thanksgiving, blessing him who provides great benefits to Israel and gives them the victory.
2 Maccabees 10:32–38 recounts Judas Maccabaeus's siege and conquest of the fortress of Gazara, where the Seleucid commander Timotheus had fled with his forces. The defenders' blasphemy against God provokes the Jewish warriors to assault the walls at dawn, set fires that burn the tower defenders alive, and ultimately execute Timotheus and his associates, after which the victors offer hymns of thanksgiving to God.
When defenders of Gazara blaspheme God, their fortress becomes their tomb—the passage teaches that mockery of the sacred invites swift divine judgment, not as cruelty but as proportionate justice.
Commentary
2 Maccabees 10:32 — Timotheus flees to Gazara. The flight of Timotheus into Gazara crowns a narrative of accumulated Seleucid defeats throughout 2 Maccabees 10. The name "Gazara" (also rendered "Gezer" in some manuscripts and related to the Gezer of the earlier conquest narratives) carries weight as a fortress of perennial strategic importance in the Shephelah foothills. That Chaereas — later identified in verse 37 as Timotheus's brother — commands the garrison underscores that this is a family redoubt, a final dynastic hold. The narrative detail of its "great strength" heightens the dramatic tension: the enemy's last refuge is formidable, and yet it will fall.
2 Maccabees 10:33 — A four-day siege. The gladness of Maccabaeus's men is not mere battle-lust; it reflects the theological confidence that pervades 2 Maccabees, namely that God himself is the champion of Israel (cf. 2 Macc 3:39). The number four carries no explicit numerological symbolism here, but it functions as a narrative pause — a period of waiting in which the defenders' true character is exposed.
2 Maccabees 10:34 — Blasphemy from within the walls. This is the passage's theological pivot. The defenders do not merely resist militarily; they "blasphemed exceedingly" and "hurled out impious words." The Greek (ἐβλασφήμουν / eblasphēmoun) signals speech directed against God himself, not merely against the Jewish fighters. This framing is deliberate: the author of 2 Maccabees consistently interprets the Maccabean conflict as a religious contest rather than merely a political one. The blasphemies transform what might otherwise read as a straightforward military siege into a defense of God's honor. This distinction will justify the fierce response that follows.
2 Maccabees 10:35 — The assault at dawn on the fifth day. "Dawn" in biblical literature is frequently the moment of divine intervention (cf. Exod 14:27; Ps 46:5). The young warriors are described as "inflamed with anger because of the blasphemies" — the Greek underlying "masculine force" (andreia) is a classical virtue term, literally "manliness" or "courage," here conscripted in service of divine zeal. The author is careful to link their fury not to personal grievance but to the offense against God. This is the righteous anger (orgē dikaia) that the tradition will distinguish from sinful wrath: it flows from love of God and love of truth, not from wounded pride.
2 Maccabees 10:36 — Fire, gates, and occupation. The coordination of the assault — some fighting their way in, others setting fire to towers, others breaking open the gates — reads as a disciplined military operation in which the very chaos of battle is providentially ordered. The blasphemers are burned alive in the towers they trusted for safety: a grim irony in which the instruments of their defiance become instruments of their judgment. The burning recalls the fire-judgments of the Prophets upon those who mock the Holy One of Israel.
2 Maccabees 10:37 — Timotheus found in a cistern. The detail that Timotheus is "hidden in a cistern" is theologically charged. Cisterns in the ancient Near East were subterranean, dark, and associated with death and futility (cf. Jer 38:6, where Jeremiah himself is cast into a cistern). The mighty commander ends hidden underground — a final, wordless commentary on the fate of those who exalt themselves against God. His brother Chaereas and the otherwise unknown Apollophanes are killed with him, closing the thread of resistance that has run through the chapter.
2 Maccabees 10:38 — Hymns and thanksgiving. The military account ends not in a victory parade but in liturgy. The blessing of the Lord "with hymns and thanksgiving" is the interpretive key to the entire pericope: every detail of the siege — the walls, the fire, the cistern — has been in service of this doxological conclusion. The formula "who provides great benefits to Israel" echoes the thanksgiving psalms (todah tradition) of the Hebrew Bible and anticipates the Eucharistic logic of the New Covenant: victory is received as gift, and gift demands praise. The final word of the passage is not the names of the dead, but the name of God.
Catholic Commentary
Catholic tradition illuminates this passage through several interlocking lenses.
Zeal for God's honor as a theological virtue. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "zeal for the house of God" (CCC 584, citing John 2:17) is a legitimate and even necessary disposition of the faithful. The young men's anger in verse 35 is not condemned but praised, because it arises from love of God rather than self-love. St. Thomas Aquinas, following Aristotle but baptizing the concept, distinguishes between the irascible appetite ordered rightly (zeal, fortitude) and sinful anger (Summa Theologiae II-II, q. 158). Here the warriors exemplify the former.
Blasphemy and its gravity. The Catechism defines blasphemy as "uttering against God — inwardly or outwardly — words of hatred, reproach, or defiance" and calls it "a grave sin" (CCC 2148). The defenders of Gazara do precisely this, and the narrative treats their destruction as an act of divine justice proportionate to the gravity of their offense.
Intercession of the dead and the communion of saints. While this passage does not directly address prayer for the dead (cf. 2 Macc 12:43–45), it is situated within the same book that provides the scriptural foundation for that doctrine. The confidence with which the Maccabean fighters act — and the confidence with which they praise afterward — reflects a worldview in which human action and divine providence cooperate without confusion, a principle the Council of Trent articulated against the Reformers' rejection of human cooperation in salvation.
Eucharistic typology of thanksgiving. The hymn of verse 38 prefigures the Eucharistic anamnesis. Pope Benedict XVI, in Sacramentum Caritatis (2007), noted that the Hebrew todah (thanksgiving offering after divine deliverance) stands behind the word "Eucharist" itself. The warriors' praise after battle is a type of that ultimate thanksgiving Christ offers through the Church.
For Today
Contemporary Catholics rarely face fortified strongholds, but the passage speaks with precision to two modern temptations. First, the temptation to treat blasphemy as trivial: in a culture where contempt for the sacred is often packaged as wit or free expression, the passage insists that mockery of God is not a neutral act but a spiritual aggression with real consequences. Catholics are invited to a recovery of holy zeal — not self-righteous anger, but the measured, love-driven indignation that refuses to shrug when God's name is dragged through contempt.
Second, the closing hymn challenges the Catholic tendency to compartmentalize prayer and action. The Maccabees do not celebrate victory and then remember to thank God later — the praise is the conclusion, the interpretive key, the whole point. This models an integrated spiritual life in which every achievement — professional, familial, intellectual — is returned to God in explicit thanksgiving, perhaps most fully in the Sunday Eucharist. Before you leave Mass, ask: what is my "Gazara" this week? What hard-won victory can I lay at the altar?
Cross-References