Catholic Commentary
David Watches from the Gate and Receives the News (Part 1)
24Now David was sitting between the two gates; and the watchman went up to the roof of the gate to the wall, and lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, a man running alone.25The watchman shouted and told the king. The king said, “If he is alone, there is news in his mouth.” He came closer and closer.26The watchman saw another man running; and the watchman called to the gatekeeper and said, “Behold, a man running alone!” The king said, “He also brings news.”27The watchman said, “I think the running of the first one is like the running of Ahimaaz the son of Zadok.” The king said, “He is a good man, and comes with good news.”28Ahimaaz called, and said to the king, “All is well.” He bowed himself before the king with his face to the earth, and said, “Blessed is Yahweh your God, who has delivered up the men who lifted up their hand against my lord the king!”29The king said, “Is it well with the young man Absalom?” Ahimaaz answered, “When Joab sent the king’s servant, even me your servant, I saw a great tumult, but I don’t know what it was.”The king said, “Come and stand here.” He came and stood still.
In 2 Samuel 18:24–31, David waits anxiously between the city gates for news of the battle against his rebellious son Absalom, receiving reports from two messengers: Ahimaaz, who announces victory but evasively avoids discussing Absalom's fate, and a Cushite servant, who confirms God's vengeance but similarly withholds the crucial answer to David's desperate question about his son's condition. The passage illustrates David's torment as father and king, conveyed through the messengers' studied silence.
A king's military victory means nothing when the son he loves may be lost—and so David waits at the gate asking the only question that matters.
Commentary
2 Samuel 18:24 — The King at the Gate David "sits between the two gates" — not on a throne, not in the field, but suspended between two thresholds. This liminal position is precise: the inner gate opens to the city; the outer gate faces the battlefield. He is both king and father, unable to act, forced only to wait. The watchman ascends to the roof of the gatehouse — a standard military post — and scans the horizon. The appearance of a single runner is immediately significant. In the ancient Near East, a runner bearing dispatches from a battle signaled either catastrophe or triumph; solitary runners were authoritative messengers, not panicked fugitives.
2 Samuel 18:25 — The King's Reading of the Runner David's interpretive observation — "If he is alone, there is news in his mouth" — is a practiced military judgment. A fleeing rout produces crowds; a single courier bearing tidings runs with purpose. This small verse reveals David's experience and intelligence even in his anguish. The phrase "he came closer and closer" mimics the slow, excruciating approach of news that cannot be hurried.
2 Samuel 18:26 — A Second Runner Appears The appearance of a second runner heightens the dramatic tension. Two messengers suggest a deliberate dispatch system — Joab has sent runners in sequence, which was standard practice for ensuring that news arrived even if one courier was intercepted. The gatekeeper is now also alert; the whole apparatus of the city is oriented toward the horizon, toward the news coming up the road.
2 Samuel 18:27 — Ahimaaz Identified by His Gait The watchman recognizes Ahimaaz by the way he runs — a vivid human detail. Ahimaaz son of Zadok the priest was a known, trusted figure (cf. 2 Sam 15:27–36; 17:17–21), a loyalist who had already risked his life for David. His identification by gait anticipates the Gospel tradition of recognition by characteristic manner (cf. Lk 24:35 — the disciples recognize Jesus in the breaking of bread; Jn 20:16 — Mary recognizes the risen Lord by the sound of her name). The king's response — "He is a good man, and comes with good news" — is tinged with both hope and anxiety: David trusts Ahimaaz, but the framing reveals that what David really wants is news about Absalom, not about the battle.
2 Samuel 18:28 — Ahimaaz's Announcement and Doxology Ahimaaz prostrates himself — the full liturgical gesture of obeisance — and his first word is shalom: "All is well." He immediately offers a doxology: "Blessed is Yahweh your God, who has delivered up the men who lifted up their hand against my lord the king." This is theologically loaded. The victory is attributed not to Joab's strategy but to divine agency. The phrase "lifted up their hand against" echoes the language of covenant rebellion; those who fought against the Lord's anointed fought against the Lord's order. Yet Ahimaaz's praise is strategically incomplete. He volunteers nothing about Absalom. When David presses him directly — "Is it well with the young man Absalom?" — Ahimaaz retreats into a studied ambiguity: "I saw a great tumult when Joab sent the king's servant and your servant, but I do not know what it was." He cannot bring himself to say it.
Verses 29–30 — The Unbearable Question Deflected "Is it well with the young man Absalom?" This question — so direct, so raw — is the heart of the entire narrative. David asks it not as a king inquiring about a rebel's fate, but as a father who has already said (18:5), "Deal gently for my sake with the young man Absalom." The king's response to Ahimaaz's evasion — "Come and stand aside" — is almost gentle. He is already reading the silence. The phrase "stood still" (וַיַּעֲמֹד, wayyaʿamod) carries a finality; Ahimaaz's narrative function is complete, his deflection absorbed, and the stage is cleared for the Cushite.
2 Samuel 18:31 — The Cushite Arrives The Cushite — unnamed, a foreign servant, likely a professional royal messenger from sub-Saharan Africa employed in the court — arrives and speaks directly: "Good news (besorah tovah) for my lord the king, for Yahweh has avenged you today of all those who rose up against you." His announcement echoes Ahimaaz's in structure but with the key word "avenged" (נָקַם, naqam) — a term of judicial finality. Crucially, the Cushite has not yet named Absalom either, but his language of comprehensive retribution leaves David with nowhere to hide. The next verse (beyond this cluster) will deliver the blow.
Typological Sense David seated between the gates — unable to fight, forced to receive news from others — typologically prefigures the Church's posture in history: the People of God waiting, watching, receiving the Gospel (εὐαγγέλιον, "good news") from messengers they did not send. The "besorah" (glad tidings) brought by runners is the Old Testament root of the New Testament "euangelion." The runner who brings incomplete news (Ahimaaz) and the one who brings the fuller, painful truth (the Cushite) together suggest the economy of progressive revelation: the law and the prophets announced partial tidings; the full Gospel required the messenger who would speak of death as well as victory.
Catholic Commentary
From the Catholic perspective, this passage opens onto several interlocking theological dimensions.
The Suffering of the Lord's Anointed. David is the paradigmatic "Christus Domini" — the Lord's Anointed — and the Church Fathers consistently read his sufferings as foreshadowing Christ's Passion. St. Augustine, in De Civitate Dei (XVII.7), treats the Absalom rebellion as a type of the betrayal of Christ by those closest to him, noting that David's crossing of the Kidron while weeping (2 Sam 15:23) directly anticipates Jesus' agony in Gethsemane across that same valley. Here, David's suspended agony between the gates similarly prefigures Christ's desolation — fully aware of what is coming, unable to prevent it, waiting in love. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (n. 555) speaks of Christ's transfiguration in relation to the suffering that must precede glory; David's vigil at the gate enacts this same structure: the king must receive the news of suffering before any consolation can come.
The "Besorah" and the Gospel. The Hebrew besorah (good news, tidings) used in v. 31 is the direct lexical ancestor of the Greek εὐαγγέλιον. The Second Vatican Council's Dei Verbum (n. 15) teaches that the Old Testament books, though containing "imperfect and temporary" elements, preserve "a sublime teaching about God, sound wisdom about human life, and a wonderful treasury of prayers, and in them the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way." The runners at Mahanaim bear besorah that is simultaneously true and incomplete — exactly the structure of the Old Covenant's witness to Christ. The Cushite's announcement of God's vengeance is true; only the New Testament reveals that God's ultimate act of vengeance against sin was accomplished not by destroying sinners but by absorbing their penalty in the body of his Son (cf. Rom 3:25–26).
Paternal Love and the Father of the Prodigal. David's singular focus — "Is it well with the young man Absalom?" — amid a military triumph has struck commentators across the tradition as a window into the nature of divine fatherhood. Pope St. John Paul II, in Dives in Misericordia (n. 5), meditates at length on the parable of the Prodigal Son as a revelation of God's paternal heart: a father who sees the son "while he was yet at a great distance" and runs to meet him. David's watchfulness at the gate — straining toward the horizon — resonates deeply with this image of the waiting, longing father.
For Today
Contemporary Catholic readers will recognize David's posture — suspended between two gates, unable to act, straining toward news he dreads — as a universal human experience: the waiting room outside surgery, the vigil beside a dying parent, the silence after a difficult conversation. Catholic spiritual tradition does not sentimentalize this anguish. St. John of the Cross identifies this kind of helpless, stripped waiting as one of the genuine pathways into contemplative union with God; it is precisely when we can neither act nor control that we are forced to receive.
Practically, this passage invites Catholics to examine how they receive difficult news. Ahimaaz's evasion is psychologically understandable but ultimately uncharitable — he leaves David in a worse limbo. There is a moral challenge here to be truthful messengers, especially in pastoral and family contexts, even when truth is painful. The Cushite, a foreigner with no personal stake in softening the blow, speaks plainly. Sometimes the person least emotionally entangled is the one who serves the truth best.
Finally, David's immediate question — not "Did we win?" but "Is it well with the young man Absalom?" — is a model of properly ordered love. Victory means nothing to David without his son. Catholics are called to this same ordering: no achievement, success, or even ecclesial triumph should eclipse our concern for the particular, beloved person who may be lost.
Cross-References