Catholic Commentary
Daniel's Continued Prosperity
28So this Daniel prospered in the reign of Darius and in the reign of Cyrus the Persian.
Daniel 6:28 reports that Daniel prospered during the reigns of both Darius the Mede and Cyrus the Persian, affirming that his righteous standing before God endured through successive imperial transitions. The verse functions as a theological seal confirming that Daniel's prosperity transcended political change and subtly validates Isaiah's earlier prophecy about Cyrus.
Daniel prospers not because he escapes the world's pressure, but because his faithfulness to God transcends regime change—and so can yours.
Catholic tradition reads Daniel 6:28 through the lens of divine providence, a doctrine defined with particular clarity in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 302–308). Providence is not passive permission but God's active, loving governance of history toward its appointed end. Daniel's prosperity under Darius and Cyrus is not coincidence or political savvy — it is the visible fruit of God's providential care for one who trusted Him completely. St. John Chrysostom, in his homilies on the book of Daniel, identifies Daniel's enduring honor as proof that "God does not abandon those who cleave to Him, even when kings and nations conspire against them."
Pope St. John Paul II, in Fides et Ratio (§16), notes that the wisdom literature and prophetic books of the Old Testament together demonstrate that human reason and faithful observance, when ordered to God, achieve a flourishing that purely pragmatic or secular wisdom cannot sustain. Daniel's wisdom and his prosperity are inseparable from his piety — a distinctly Catholic understanding that grace perfects nature rather than destroying it.
St. Jerome, who translated Daniel from Aramaic for the Vulgate, saw in Daniel's unbroken fidelity across multiple imperial transitions a type of the Church herself, which he described as "prospering not despite persecution, but through it." The Council of Trent cited Daniel implicitly in its decrees on justification (Session VI) to illustrate that holiness expressed in concrete acts of obedience — not mere interior sentiment — is the authentic mark of one who is truly "justified" before God. Daniel's life embodies the Tridentine axiom that faith working through charity (Gal 5:6) produces visible, if not always earthly, fruitfulness.
For a Catholic today, Daniel 6:28 challenges the widespread assumption that fidelity to God is costly in purely practical terms — that the devout Catholic will be sidelined professionally, socially, or politically. Daniel's story, sealed by this final verse, insists that the opposite is ultimately true, though the timeline is God's, not ours. This is not a prosperity-gospel promise of material reward; it is the deeper assurance that a life integrated around God — regular prayer (Dan 6:10), public witness, moral courage — develops virtues of prudence, integrity, and resilience that themselves bear fruit in the world.
Concretely: a Catholic employee who refuses to falsify data, a student who will not plagiarize, a politician who will not compromise a non-negotiable moral principle — each faces their own "lion's den." The temptation is to believe that the conspirators win, that the compromisers prosper. Daniel 6:28 says: wait. Empires pass; character endures. As a practical discipline, readers are invited to identify one arena of their life where faithfulness to God is currently costly, and to bring that specific situation before God in prayer each day this week — trusting, as Daniel did (v. 23), that God is both aware and active.
Commentary
Verse 28: "So this Daniel prospered in the reign of Darius, and in the reign of Cyrus the Persian."
The single closing verse of Daniel 6 functions as a formal literary seal (a colophon) on all that has preceded it, and its brevity is itself eloquent. After the drama of conspiracy, the sealed den, the king's sleepless night, the miraculous deliverance, and the punishing of the conspirators, the inspired author deliberately decelerates into calm summary. The word "prospered" (Aramaic tzlaḥ, or in some textual traditions the Hebrew cognate ṣālaḥ) carries more weight than mere material success. In the biblical idiom, to "prosper" (cf. Joshua 1:8; Psalm 1:3) describes the flourishing of one whose way is aligned with God's will — an integration of inner righteousness and outward fruitfulness. Daniel does not merely survive; he thrives. The verb is thus a theological verdict on Daniel's entire manner of life.
The mention of two kings — Darius the Mede and Cyrus the Persian — is historically and theologically significant. Darius represents the Median phase of the empire (cf. Dan 5:31; 6:1), while Cyrus the Persian (Cyrus II, "the Great," r. 559–530 BC) is the conqueror who issued the famous Edict of Cyrus in 538 BC permitting the Jewish exiles to return to their homeland (cf. Ezra 1:1–4; 2 Chr 36:22–23). The pairing underscores that Daniel's prosperity was not accidental or tied to any single political patron — it transcended regime changes. Empires rise and fall; Daniel's standing before God endures through them all. This is a pointed theological message to Jews living under Hellenistic oppression in the Maccabean period, the context in which the book of Daniel reached its final literary form: no imperial power — not Antiochus IV Epiphanes, not Rome — can extinguish God's care for the righteous.
The phrase "Cyrus the Persian" is particularly resonant. Isaiah had prophesied Cyrus by name more than a century earlier (Isa 44:28–45:1), calling him God's "anointed" (Hebrew mashiach) — a startling application of messianic language to a pagan king. That Daniel prosperes into the reign of this very figure quietly confirms the reliability of prophecy and suggests that Daniel himself may have witnessed, in his old age, the beginning of Israel's restoration. Thus, the verse looks backward (resolving the lion's den account) and forward (pointing toward the fulfillment of Isaiah's prophecy and the return from exile), binding history, prophecy, and personal holiness into a single closing declaration.
At the typological level, Daniel's sustained prosperity across hostile kingdoms prefigures the endurance of the Church through successive persecuting powers. Just as Daniel was "cast into" the den and emerged unharmed, Christ was cast into the tomb and rose; and just as Daniel continued to prosper after his deliverance, the post-Resurrection Church prospers even through trial. The "prosperity" is not worldly domination but the indestructible vitality of a life — and a community — united to God.