Catholic Commentary
The Twelve Curses of the Covenant: The Levitical Dodecalogue of Maledictions (Part 2)
22‘Cursed is he who lies with his sister, his father’s daughter or his mother’s daughter.’23‘Cursed is he who lies with his mother-in-law.’24‘Cursed is he who secretly kills his neighbor.’25‘Cursed is he who takes a bribe to kill an innocent person.’26‘Cursed is he who doesn’t uphold the words of this law by doing them.’
The final curse—failure to uphold all the law—is the darkest prayer of Israel, one only Christ's redemptive curse-bearing can answer.
Deuteronomy 27:22–26 concludes the Levitical Dodecalogue of Maledictions with five curses targeting sexual violations within the family, covert murder, judicial corruption through bribery, and — in a sweeping climactic declaration — the failure to uphold the whole of God's Law. These are not merely legal penalties but covenant pronouncements, solemnly ratified by the assembled people of Israel on Mount Ebal, binding every Israelite before God. The final verse (v. 26) is unique in its universality: it casts a shadow over all human beings who fail to perform the entire Law, a text St. Paul will seize upon to demonstrate the impossibility of justification by works alone and the necessity of Christ's redemptive curse-bearing.
Verse 22 — Cursed is he who lies with his sister (his father's daughter or his mother's daughter): The curse on incest with a sister — whether full-blooded or half-blooded — reflects and intensifies the legal codes of Leviticus 18:9 and 20:17, where the same act is condemned as a "disgrace" (Hebrew: ḥesed, here used pejoratively, meaning a shameful violation of loyalty). The doubled specification — "his father's daughter or his mother's daughter" — ensures that no legal loophole through blended families dissolves the prohibition. Incest corrupts the household, the fundamental cell of Israelite covenantal life. The union of those bound by the closest natural bonds into sexual union overturns the created order of family love, which is designed to be generative-outward, not self-enclosed. Typologically, the inward corruption of the family prefigures what Paul, citing this passage's tradition, will describe as the disordering of desire in Romans 1.
Verse 23 — Cursed is he who lies with his mother-in-law: This prohibition extends the incest barrier to the affinal family (family by marriage), echoing Leviticus 18:17 and 20:14. In Israelite kinship structure, a man's union with his wife made her family his own; the mother-in-law occupied the status of a mother. The sexual violation of this relationship thus carries the moral weight of both adultery and incest. It is notable that Judah's unwitting act with Tamar (Genesis 38), his daughter-in-law, haunts this legal horizon. The Levitical and Deuteronomic codes progressively clarify and codify what the patriarchal narratives dramatize as catastrophe. The curse functions as a hedge around the sanctity of the family as a whole, not merely of the biological nuclear unit.
Verse 24 — Cursed is he who secretly kills his neighbor: This verse turns from sexual sin to blood guilt, and the word "secretly" (bassāter) is pivotal. The public legal system — judges, witnesses, cities of refuge — was established precisely to adjudicate and restrain open violence. What the court cannot reach — the hidden strike, the private assassination, the poison administered in darkness — God's curse reaches. The Decalogue's "You shall not kill" (Deuteronomy 5:17) is here extended into the realm of the invisible. This curse reveals the theological logic running through the entire Dodecalogue: it addresses what human legal systems cannot punish. The assembly's public "Amen" means that Israel collectively acknowledges God as the judge of hidden acts.
Verse 25 — Cursed is he who takes a bribe to kill an innocent person: Where verse 24 targets the hidden killer himself, verse 25 targets the corrupted intermediary — the judge or official who weaponizes the justice system against the innocent. The Hebrew ("innocent") carries enormous weight: it is the blood of the blameless that cries out to God (cf. Genesis 4:10; Numbers 35:33). The Deuteronomic law code is relentlessly concerned with the corruption of judges (see Deuteronomy 16:19: "You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality; and you shall not accept a bribe"). Here the sin is not merely judicial malpractice but judicial murder — the deliberate engineering of an innocent person's death through legal means. The Fathers will see in this verse a pre-figuration of Judas's thirty pieces of silver (Matthew 27:3–5) and of those who manipulated Roman law to condemn Christ.
From a Catholic theological perspective, this passage operates on at least three interlocking levels.
The Law as Revealer of Sin: The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "the Law is a pedagogue" (CCC 1963), not an instrument of salvation in itself but a mirror that reveals the depth of human moral failure. The curses of Deuteronomy 27 do precisely this pedagogical work: they expose not merely external transgressions but the hidden movements of sin — covert murder, bribed injustice — that no human tribunal can reach. St. Augustine in De Spiritu et Littera (c. 412 AD) argues that the Mosaic Law was given precisely to multiply the awareness of transgression (cf. Romans 5:20) so that humanity might despair of self-redemption and cry out for grace.
The Totality Clause and Christ's Vicarious Atonement: Verse 26 receives its fullest theological unpacking in Galatians 3:10–14, where Paul places the entire human race under the meta-curse of verse 26. Catholic tradition has never read Paul's argument here as a repudiation of the Law's goodness — the Law is "holy, just, and good" (Romans 7:12) — but as a demonstration that fallen humanity cannot satisfy its total demand unaided. The Council of Trent (Session VI, Decree on Justification, 1547) affirmed that Christ "merited justification for us by His most holy Passion on the wood of the cross, and made satisfaction for us to God the Father." Christ becomes the curse (Galatians 3:13) not because the Law is evil, but because human sinfulness has rendered full compliance impossible. The solemn "Amen" of the people is thus the darkest prayer of the Old Covenant — one that only the New Adam can answer.
Sexual Ethics and the Integrity of the Family: The incest prohibitions (vv. 22–23) are grounded theologically not merely in social utility but in the sacredness of the natural family as an image of divine covenant love. Casti Connubii (Pius XI, 1930) and the Catechism (CCC 2380–2391) situate these prohibitions within the broader understanding that sexual union belongs to a covenantal context that mirrors the fidelity and fruitfulness of God's love. St. John Chrysostom (Homilies on 1 Corinthians) and St. Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologiae II-II, q. 154, a. 9) both argue that incest violates not only justice but the natural reverence owed to familial bonds, which exists to channel love outward rather than collapse it inward.
The final verse of this cluster — "Cursed is he who does not uphold the words of this law by doing them" — confronts contemporary Catholics with an uncomfortable truth: there is no such thing as a partial Christianity. The tendency to pick and choose from the moral teaching of the Church, retaining what is culturally convenient and quietly setting aside what is demanding, mirrors exactly the attitude this verse condemns. The Catechism's integrated vision of morality (CCC 1691–1696) insists that Christian moral life is not a menu but a vocation — a total orientation of the person toward God.
The curses on hidden sins (vv. 24–25) are particularly urgent in an era of anonymous digital life, where corruption, calumny, and covert harm can be inflicted from behind screens. The theological logic of the Dodecalogue insists that God sees what courts, algorithms, and communities cannot: the hidden strike, the quiet bribe, the whispered slander. For Catholics, the Sacrament of Confession is the appointed place where hidden sins are brought out of darkness and laid before the God who already sees them — not to incur the curse, but precisely to have it lifted.
Verse 26 — Cursed is he who does not uphold the words of this law by doing them: This final curse is the theological keystone of the entire Dodecalogue and, in many ways, of the Mosaic covenant itself. It is encyclopedic in scope — kol-dibrê ("all the words") — admitting no exceptions or gradations. Every Israelite who fails, in any respect, to perform the whole Law falls under this curse. The verse is consciously programmatic: it binds together all the specific curses of chapters 27–28 under one meta-curse. The Hebrew qûm ("uphold, confirm, fulfill, establish") suggests not merely passive non-violation but active, embodied performance.
St. Paul quotes this verse directly in Galatians 3:10 — "For all who rely on works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, 'Cursed be everyone who does not abide by all things written in the Book of the Law, and do them'" — making it the hinge of his argument that Christ, by becoming a curse for us (Galatians 3:13, citing Deuteronomy 21:23), redeems those who could not fulfill the Law's total demand. The "Amen" of all the people is not merely liturgical — it is their own binding self-condemnation, against which only the New Covenant in Christ's blood can speak a final word.