Catholic Commentary
Oholibah's Greater Corruption: Jerusalem's Lust for Assyria and Babylon (Part 2)
19Yet she multiplied her prostitution, remembering the days of her youth, in which she had played the prostitute in the land of Egypt.20She lusted after their lovers, whose flesh is as the flesh of donkeys, and whose issue is like the issue of horses.21Thus you called to memory the lewdness of your youth, in the caressing of your nipples by the Egyptians because of your youthful breasts.
Ezekiel 23:19–21 describes Jerusalem's intensified idolatry as she nostalgically recalls her pre-Exodus time in Egypt, lusting after pagan powers with the same corrupt desire that was formed during her slavery. The passage uses graphic sexual imagery to convey theological horror: Jerusalem's apostasy is not a new sin but the reactivation of an ancient compulsion rooted in her degraded past.
Sin doesn't always tempt you forward—sometimes it recruits your own memory, making slavery feel like home.
Commentary
Verse 19: Multiplication of Prostitution and the Memory of Egypt
The opening word "yet" (Hebrew: wattarbeh, "and she increased/multiplied") is crucial. It signals not merely continuation but escalation — an intensification of the behavior already condemned in vv. 11–18. What is theologically remarkable here is the mechanism of the relapse: memory. Oholibah does not encounter Egypt freshly; she remembers her days of youth there. The Hebrew zākar (to remember) is a loaded covenantal term throughout Scripture — YHWH remembers His covenant with Israel (Gen 9:15; Ex 2:24), and Israel is repeatedly commanded to remember her redemption (Deut 16:3). Here that covenantal faculty is grotesquely inverted: rather than remembering the Exodus as liberation, Jerusalem remembers Egypt as a place of erotic formation. The "days of her youth" refer to the pre-Exodus period in Egypt (cf. Ez 16:22; 23:3), when Israel was not yet fully constituted as the covenant people. Ezekiel is insisting that Israel's idolatrous tendencies were not an aberration but were baked into her history from the very beginning — a sobering pastoral insight.
Verse 20: The Bestial Imagery
Verse 20 contains the most graphically sexual language in the Old Testament. The lovers whom Oholibah craves are described with two anatomical comparisons: their "flesh" (bāśār, which also means "body" and, idiomatically, "genitalia") is like that of donkeys, and their "issue" (zirmah, seminal emission) is like that of horses. The shock is entirely intentional. Ezekiel is a priest (1:3) writing for an audience of exiles in Babylon, and his use of language that elsewhere in the Torah would be associated with ritual impurity (Lev 15; 18:23 — the prohibition against bestiality comes immediately to mind in this context) is a deliberate strategy of prophetic revulsion. The point is not pornographic titillation but theological horror: Jerusalem, the holy city, the bride of YHWH, has reduced her desire to the level of animal instinct, seeking out pagan powers not for wisdom, protection, or true alliance, but for sheer carnal appetite — political lust stripped of any pretense of reason or faithfulness. The Egyptian pharaohs and their armies, powerful and physically imposing, have become an idol of raw power that Jerusalem worships with her body politic.
Verse 21: The Return to the Caress of Egypt
Verse 21 brings the passage to a harrowing climax by connecting the present apostasy back to its origin. The phrase "the lewdness (zimmāh) of your youth" reprises the accusation of v. 8 (cf. 16:22), and the specific anatomical detail — "the caressing of your nipples by the Egyptians because of your youthful breasts" — echoes v. 3 almost verbatim. This deliberate verbal repetition is a literary and theological device: Jerusalem's current apostasy is not a new sin but the same sin, its roots fully exposed. The "caressing" ('innâ, also translated as "handled" or "fondled") in Egypt was the original formation of Israel's corrupt desire. Ezekiel is saying, in effect: every time Jerusalem turns back to Egypt for military alliance, she is not making a prudent political calculation — she is acting out a deep psychic compulsion formed in slavery. This has a devastating pastoral implication: sin can reshape the soul's very memory and desire, so that what should be remembered as degradation is remembered as pleasure.
The Typological and Spiritual Senses
In the allegorical reading developed by the Fathers, Oholibah is the soul that, having received grace and entered into covenant with God, falls back into the passions of its pre-baptismal life. Egypt is, throughout the Fathers (Origen, Augustine, Gregory the Great), a figure of the world, the flesh, and slavery to sin. The soul's "memory of Egypt" becomes a type of concupiscence — the disordered inclination that remains even after baptism, which, as the Catechism teaches (CCC 1264), is "not able to harm those who do not consent to it" but which must be resisted vigilantly. The regression to Egypt represents what spiritual theology calls recidivism — the relapse into former sin patterns — which both the Desert Fathers and St. John Cassian identify as especially dangerous because it is fueled not by new temptation but by the soul's own treacherous memory.
Catholic Commentary
Catholic tradition brings several uniquely illuminating lenses to this passage.
On Concupiscence and Memory: The Catechism (CCC 2515–2516) teaches that concupiscence "stems from the disobedience of the first sin" and "unsettles man's moral faculties." Ezekiel's portrait of Oholibah remembering her Egyptian youth and being drawn back to it maps precisely onto the theological anthropology of concupiscence as a disordered faculty of desire rooted in memory. St. Augustine, whose entire Confessions is structured around the drama of disordered vs. rightly ordered memory, writes: "Our heart is restless, until it repose in Thee" (Conf. I.1) — and shows across ten books how the soul's memory can keep it tethered to former sins long after conversion.
On Idolatry as Infidelity: The Second Vatican Council's Lumen Gentium (§6) describes the Church using the nuptial metaphor, drawing directly from the prophetic tradition. Ezekiel 23 is one of the foundational texts establishing that covenant infidelity is always simultaneously a theological and a nuptial betrayal. The CCC (CCC 2380) draws on this tradition when describing adultery as a figure of idolatry.
On the Body as Theological Site: The deliberate physicality of Ezekiel's language anticipates what St. John Paul II developed in his Theology of the Body: the body and its acts are never merely biological but are always theological speech. When Oholibah gives her body to the Egyptians, she is making a theological statement about where she locates ultimate power and security — and that statement is a lie about God.
Church Fathers: Origen (Homilies on Ezekiel) reads this passage as the soul's captivity to sensual passion; Jerome, in his Commentary on Ezekiel, notes that the "days of youth in Egypt" signify the soul's bondage to the world before baptismal grace.
For Today
These verses confront the contemporary Catholic with a question that is far more personal than it first appears: What is your Egypt? Every baptized Christian carries a pre-grace history — patterns of life, relationships, and gratifications that predated the covenant of faith. Ezekiel's insight is that sin does not merely tempt from outside; it recruits the soul's own memory, making what was degrading seem, in retrospect, desirable.
This has concrete applications. For someone in recovery from addiction, the dangerous moment is not always a new temptation but the warm, unbidden memory of the old pleasure. For someone who has left a spiritually damaging relationship, the pull back is often nostalgia rather than reason. For a culture, "returning to Egypt" can look like the Church accommodating herself to the political power of the moment — seeking security in worldly alliance rather than prophetic independence.
The practical discipline Ezekiel's passage demands is a purification of memory — what St. John Paul II called in Memory and Identity the redemption of history. The sacrament of Confession is not merely absolution; it is the regular, disciplined work of allowing God to reframe the soul's past, so that Egypt is remembered not as pleasure but as slavery, and the Exodus — Baptism — is remembered as the defining event of one's identity.
Cross-References