Catholic Commentary
Esau Returns and Discovers the Deception (Part 2)
38Esau said to his father, “Do you have just one blessing, my father? Bless me, even me also, my father.” Esau lifted up his voice, and wept.
Genesis 27:38 depicts Esau's desperate plea to his father Isaac for a blessing after learning that Jacob has already received it, culminating in Esau weeping with profound grief. The verse establishes that Esau's sorrow is genuine loss and consequence, though—as later Christian tradition notes—not accompanied by repentance for his earlier choice to sell his birthright.
Esau's tears fall not because God is cruel, but because some choices—and some moments—cannot be unmade, and his grief comes too late to change them.
St. Ambrose (De Jacob et Vita Beata) adds a moral-spiritual dimension: Esau's tragedy is the culmination of a life shaped by preference for the present over the eternal. The birthright sold for a bowl of lentils (Gen 25:29–34) and the wives taken without parental counsel (Gen 26:34–35) form a pattern of choosing the immediate and sensory over the covenantal and enduring. His weeping is genuine—but it is the sorrow of consequence, not yet the sorrow of conversion.
The Epistle to the Hebrews will later comment directly on this moment (Heb 12:16–17), warning believers not to become like Esau, "a profane person, who for one morsel of food sold his birthright," for afterward "he found no place for repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears." The Greek word metanoia is conspicuously absent in Esau's response—he does not repent of his sale of the birthright; he mourns his loss of the blessing. It is a crucial distinction.
Catholic tradition reads this verse at several registers simultaneously, and each illuminates a dimension of sacramental and moral theology.
On the Irreversibility of Grace and Election: The Catechism teaches that God's call is irrevocable (CCC 218, drawing on Rom 11:29). Isaac's pronouncement over Jacob is an icon of this principle: what God has destined and spoken does not return void (Is 55:11). This is not divine arbitrariness but fidelity. The Fathers, following St. Paul (Rom 9:10–13), were careful to note that Jacob's election was not earned but given—"not because of works but because of his call" (Rom 9:11). Esau's question "Do you have just one blessing?" thus receives, from Catholic theology, a nuanced answer: God's blessing is superabundant and universal in its offer, but it is singular in its covenant form—it flows through the one Body of Christ, the Church.
On Sorrow Without Repentance: The great tradition distinguishes between contritio (contrition, grief rooted in love of God and true metanoia) and attritio or worldly sorrow. St. Thomas Aquinas (ST II-II, q. 85) and St. Augustine both note that grief over loss of goods is not the same as grief over offense against God. Esau's tears are real, but Hebrews 12:17 signals they do not constitute repentance. The Council of Trent (Session XIV, De Paenitentia) affirmed this distinction: "mere natural sorrow" is insufficient for the Sacrament of Penance; what is required is a turning of the will, not merely feeling the sting of consequences.
On the One Mediator: At the deepest typological level, the "one blessing" points toward Christ, the one Mediator (1 Tim 2:5), in whom all the blessings of heaven have been lavished upon humanity (Eph 1:3). There is one blessing because there is one Son, one Cross, one Resurrection. The Church's liturgical tradition—especially the solemn blessing at Mass—participates in this singular divine berākāh poured out in Christ.
Esau's anguished question resonates with anyone who has ever stood before a closed door and realized, too late, what they had devalued or deferred. Contemporary Catholics face their own versions of Esau's tragedy: the sacrament postponed indefinitely, the relationship with God treated as always available but never urgent, the spiritual birthright traded for comfort, convenience, or distraction.
The Catechism warns that "there are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit" (CCC 1864). Esau's weeping is not a picture of God's cruelty but of human freedom's weight. Grace is not coercive; the moment of offer must be met with a response.
Practically, this verse invites a daily examination: Am I treating my faith—Mass, Confession, prayer, Scripture—as the one irreplaceable blessing it is, or as something I can always reclaim tomorrow? The Liturgy of the Hours, the Sacrament of Reconciliation, and the daily Examen of St. Ignatius of Loyola are concrete Catholic practices designed precisely to prevent the "Esau pattern"—the drift toward spiritual negligence that only registers its cost when the door has swung shut.
Commentary
Genesis 27:38 — Literal and Narrative Analysis
The scene reaches its emotional climax in this single verse. Esau has already received from Isaac a secondary oracle (vv. 39–40), yet he refuses to accept it as sufficient. His question—"Do you have just one blessing, my father?"—is remarkable for what it reveals about his theology and his grief simultaneously. On one level it is a cry of desperation, almost a bargaining plea: surely a father's reservoir of blessing is not so narrow that it can only flow once? On another level, it inadvertently articulates a profound theological truth that Esau does not yet grasp: yes, in the economy of covenant election, there is in a decisive sense only one blessing—the blessing of the chosen heir through whom the divine promise runs.
The Hebrew word for blessing here is berākāh, used repeatedly throughout this chapter (vv. 12, 19, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 35, 36, 38, 41). Its density is deliberate; the entire episode is saturated with the word so that the reader understands that something cosmically significant, not merely domestic or patriarchal, is at stake. A berākāh in the ancient Near Eastern and Israelite world was not a sentiment but a performative act with ontological weight—it conferred reality, not merely wished for it. When Isaac spoke over Jacob, something happened that cannot unhappen.
The phrase "even me also" (gam-'ōtî, in Hebrew) carries a plaintive urgency, a kind of doubling of the self in petition. Esau is not merely asking for a blessing; he is asking to be seen, to be counted, to be included. His sense of self has been halved by what Jacob has done, and this petition is a reaching toward restoration.
Then comes the most humanly devastating detail: "Esau lifted up his voice, and wept." This is the same verb (bākāh) used for some of Scripture's most profound grief—Joseph weeping over his brothers (Gen 45:2), Hagar weeping over her dying son (Gen 21:16), the exiles weeping by the rivers of Babylon (Ps 137:1). It is never a light detail when Scripture records that a person wept. The weeping of Esau here is not self-pitying sentimentalism but the raw grief of a man who has encountered the irreversibility of time and choice.
Typological and Spiritual Senses
The Church Fathers read this scene through the lens of Israel and the Gentiles. St. Augustine (City of God, XVI.37) interprets Jacob and Esau typologically: Jacob represents the Church—the New Israel gathered from all nations—and Esau represents the older people who, though firstborn in the order of flesh, have been superseded in the order of grace. Esau's weeping, on this reading, carries an eschatological resonance: it anticipates the grief of those who, having despised or deferred the moment of grace, find the door closed at last (cf. Mt 25:11–12).