Catholic Commentary
The Shechemites Accept and Undergo Circumcision
18Their words pleased Hamor and Shechem, Hamor’s son.19The young man didn’t wait to do this thing, because he had delight in Jacob’s daughter, and he was honored above all the house of his father.20Hamor and Shechem, his son, came to the gate of their city, and talked with the men of their city, saying,21“These men are peaceful with us. Therefore let them live in the land and trade in it. For behold, the land is large enough for them. Let’s take their daughters to us for wives, and let’s give them our daughters.22Only on this condition will the men consent to us to live with us, to become one people, if every male among us is circumcised, as they are circumcised.23Won’t their livestock and their possessions and all their animals be ours? Only let’s give our consent to them, and they will dwell with us.”24All who went out of the gate of his city listened to Hamor, and to Shechem his son; and every male was circumcised, all who went out of the gate of his city.
Genesis 34:18–24 describes how Hamor and Shechem persuade the men of their city to accept circumcision, publicly framing it as a path to peaceful coexistence and intermarriage with Jacob's family, but privately motivated by economic gain and Shechem's desire for Dinah. The entire male population agrees and undergoes the rite, though the text emphasizes they view it as a commercial transaction rather than a genuine covenant sign.
Circumcision without conversion is just a scar—the Shechemites received the covenant's sign while their hearts remained entirely closed to the God behind it.
Commentary
Genesis 34:18 — "Their words pleased Hamor and Shechem": The pleasure (Hebrew yāṭab, "it was good in their eyes") stands in ironic contrast to the moral context. What "seems good" here is agreeable precisely because it serves personal and civic ambition. Hamor hears a pathway to tribal amalgamation; Shechem hears the removal of the last obstacle between himself and Dinah. Neither hears anything remotely analogous to what Abraham heard when God first commanded circumcision (Gen 17).
Genesis 34:19 — "The young man didn't wait… because he had delight in Jacob's daughter": The Hebrew ḥāpēṣ ("delight, desire") is the same root used elsewhere to describe lawful love, but here it is the engine of a plan built on violation. The narrator notes that Shechem was "honored above all the house of his father" — a detail that explains both his capacity to carry the city with him and the added gravity of his original crime. His haste is not the eagerness of the proselyte but the impatience of the man who will do whatever it takes to get what he wants. Circumcision is instrumental, not transformative.
Verses 20–21 — "Hamor and Shechem came to the gate": The city gate was the formal deliberative space of ancient Near Eastern civic life, the place of elders, judgments, and binding agreements (cf. Ruth 4:1–12; Deut 22:15). The public address that follows is a masterpiece of motivated reasoning. Hamor and Shechem describe Jacob's clan as šĕlēmîm — "peaceable men," sharing a root with shalom — a characterization that is technically accurate but strategically deployed. They present intermarriage and economic integration as mutual goods, emphasizing the land's spaciousness to allay fears of competition.
Verses 22–23 — The real argument: The Shechemites' leaders do not rest their case on the spiritual or relational arguments they offered to Jacob's sons. Before the city assembly, the clinching argument is frankly economic: "Won't their livestock and their possessions and all their animals be ours?" The circumcision is framed as an entry fee that will ultimately enrich Shechem. This nakedly utilitarian pitch reveals that the sacred sign is being bartered. The text never suggests that a single Shechemite man asks about the God of Abraham. The covenant mark is being sought entirely on commercial and carnal grounds — a profane inversion of its purpose.
Genesis 34:24 — Universal compliance: The swiftness and totality of the city's compliance ("every male," repeated emphatically) is narratively crucial. It sets up the devastating irony of the following verses, where Simeon and Levi exploit exactly this moment of mass incapacitation. But it also carries its own theological weight: an entire city has received the sign of the Abrahamic covenant with no faith, no instruction, no intention of worshipping YHWH. The repetition of "all who went out of the gate" brackets the scene (vv. 20, 24), giving it a formal completeness that makes what follows feel all the more catastrophic.
Typological and spiritual senses: The Fathers frequently distinguished between the signum (sign) and the res (reality signified). What the Shechemites undergo is circumcision as pure sign, emptied of its covenantal res — the pledge of faith, the belonging to YHWH's people, the promise of the seed. St. Augustine (Contra Faustum II) and later medieval exegetes such as Hugh of Saint-Victor saw in hollow reception of sacred signs a permanent pastoral warning. The narrative also anticipates the New Testament debate over circumcision: Paul's insistence (Rom 2:25–29) that "circumcision is of the heart" finds its negative illustration here. Shechem's city performs the rite; they remain, in every meaningful sense, uncircumcised.
Catholic Commentary
Catholic tradition illuminates this passage at multiple levels. First, it exemplifies what the Catechism calls the necessary unity of sign and interior disposition. CCC §1131 teaches that the sacraments "bear fruit in those who receive them with the required dispositions." While the Shechemite men are not receiving a sacrament in the Christian sense, the narrative dramatizes with brutal clarity the vacuousness of sacred rites performed without faith or genuine conversion. The Church Fathers return repeatedly to this principle. Origen (Homilies on Genesis XVI) notes that the uncircumcised heart renders the physical rite meaningless — a teaching that flows directly into the New Testament contrast between letter and spirit (2 Cor 3:6).
Second, Catholic moral theology's treatment of proportionate means and sinful ends is relevant. The sons of Jacob had presented a legitimate request — circumcision as condition of covenant incorporation — but with a secretly violent intention behind it (Gen 34:13 notes they "answered with deceit"). The Shechemites' leaders, in turn, dressed a commercial acquisition strategy in the language of peaceful integration. Both parties are using a holy institution for purposes alien to its nature. The Magisterium, drawing on natural law reasoning (cf. Veritatis Splendor §78), consistently teaches that good ends cannot justify morally defective means — a principle both parties in this negotiation violate.
Third, this passage contributes to the Church's typological reading of circumcision as a foreshadowing of Baptism (Col 2:11–12; CCC §527). The Shechemites' hollow circumcision thus becomes, by negative analogy, a warning about sacramental indifference — receiving Baptism or any sacrament as social convention, family expectation, or personal advantage rather than as a genuine encounter with Christ.
For Today
This passage speaks pointedly to a culture — and a Church — where sacramental practice can become decoupled from living faith. Contemporary Catholics will recognize the Shechemite dynamic in the pressure to baptize children "for the family," receive First Communion as a social milestone, or seek Church marriage for aesthetic or legal convenience, without catechesis, conversion, or commitment. The passage invites an examination of conscience: Why do I receive the sacraments I receive? What is the interior disposition I bring? The Shechemites moved with impressive speed (v. 19) — entire-city compliance within a single scene — but speed and social unanimity are not evidence of authenticity.
Pastors, catechists, and RCIA sponsors are also directly addressed: the narrative warns against allowing the rites of initiation to become merely social transactions. The Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA), with its extended period of formation and discernment, stands as the Church's structural resistance to exactly this kind of hollow incorporation. Where Shechem rushed, the Church deliberately slows down — insisting that the sign and the reality it signifies must travel together.
Cross-References