Catholic Commentary
Jesus Explains the Meaning of the Footwashing (Part 2)
20Most certainly I tell you, he who receives whomever I send, receives me; and he who receives me, receives him who sent me.”
John 13:20 teaches that receiving those whom Jesus sends is equivalent to receiving Jesus himself, and receiving Jesus means receiving God the Father. The verse establishes a chain of spiritual authority and presence in which apostolic messengers carry the identity and authority of their sender, grounded in the Jewish concept of emissary equivalence but elevated to divine significance.
When you receive a priest, a minister, a messenger sent by Christ, you are not encountering a mere human being—you are receiving Christ himself, and through him, the Father who sent him.
Typological and Spiritual Sense
At the typological level, Jesus stands here as the new Moses. In Numbers 11, Moses laments the burden of leading the people alone; God takes the spirit that is on Moses and places it on the seventy elders. They prophesy because they share Moses's spirit — a pattern fulfilled when Jesus breathes the Holy Spirit upon the apostles (Jn 20:22). The footwashing itself, culminating in this commissioning verse, is a kind of investiture: those who have been washed are now authorized to go, and in going, to make the Lord present.
The spiritual sense deepens further: the verse suggests that encountering a minister of the Church — a bishop, priest, or anyone legitimately sent by Christ through the Church — is not a merely human encounter. The one who receives a priest bringing Communion to the sick, or a deacon proclaiming the Gospel, receives Christ himself, and in him, the Father.
This verse is foundational to the Catholic theology of apostolic succession and sacred orders. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "Christ is the source of all priesthood" and that ordained ministers "act in the person of Christ the Head" (in persona Christi Capitis, CCC 1548). John 13:20 provides the Johannine scriptural anchor for this doctrine: the "sending" is not a delegation of administrative authority but a participation in Christ's own mission from the Father.
St. Ignatius of Antioch, writing around AD 107, drew explicitly on this logic: "Wherever the bishop appears, let the congregation be present; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church" (Letter to the Smyrnaeans, 8). Ignatius understood that the bishop, as the one sent in apostolic succession, makes Christ present to the local church. To receive the bishop is to receive Christ.
St. Thomas Aquinas (Commentary on the Gospel of John, Lecture 6 on Ch. 13) notes that this verse places a solemn dignity upon those who are sent, while simultaneously guarding against self-aggrandizement: their authority is wholly derivative. They are great not in themselves but insofar as they transparently bear the sender.
The Second Vatican Council's Lumen Gentium (§20–21) grounds its teaching on the episcopate in precisely this theology: the apostles were sent by Christ as he was sent by the Father, and their successors the bishops carry on this unbroken chain. The Council cites John 20:21 in this context, but 13:20 provides the fuller Johannine framework — the chain begins not with the commissioning of the Twelve alone, but in the eternal procession of the Son from the Father.
Crucially, the verse also has an ecclesiological implication for the laity: the faithful who receive the Word preached, the sacraments administered, and the pastoral care offered by legitimate ministers are receiving Christ. This gives the entire sacramental economy a Christological and Trinitarian depth that no merely functional or sociological account of ministry can exhaust.
For contemporary Catholics, John 13:20 is a bracing corrective to two opposite temptations. The first is clericalism — the inflation of ordained ministry into a power-seeking enterprise severed from service. Jesus delivers this declaration after washing feet: the chain of divine authority runs precisely through those who kneel before others, not those who lord it over them. Ordained ministers who forget the basin and towel of verses 1–17 have forgotten the condition of the sending.
The second temptation is anti-institutionalism — the modern impulse to treat the Church's visible, hierarchical ministry as an obstacle to authentic encounter with God. John 13:20 insists otherwise. When a priest absolves a penitent, when a deacon proclaims the Gospel, when a bishop confirms the young, Christ himself is received in that moment — and in him, the Father. This is not magic or clericalism; it is the logic of the Incarnation extended sacramentally through time.
Practically: the next time you receive the Eucharist from the hands of a priest or extraordinary minister, or hear the Gospel proclaimed from the ambo, receive it with the full weight of this verse in mind — the one who sent me sent them; and through them, I come to you.
Commentary
John 13:20 — Literal and Narrative Flow
John 13:20 stands at the hinge between the footwashing narrative and the announcement of Judas's betrayal (13:21–30). Its placement is not accidental. Jesus has just washed the disciples' feet, redefined greatness as service (vv. 12–17), and acknowledged that one among them would betray him (v. 18, citing Ps 41:9). Now, before the darkness of betrayal closes in, he makes a sweeping, luminous declaration about the dignity and authority of those he sends.
"Most certainly I tell you" (ἀμὴν ἀμὴν λέγω ὑμῖν): The double "Amen" formula — unique to John's Gospel, occurring 25 times — signals that what follows carries the weight of divine revelation, not merely rabbinic opinion. Jesus speaks with an authority that belongs only to one who is himself the truth (cf. Jn 14:6). This is not a general observation but a solemn, binding declaration about the structure of his mission.
"He who receives whomever I send": The verb pempō (to send) here is significant. John's Gospel uses two verbs for sending — pempō and apostellō — sometimes interchangeably, but pempō often emphasizes the ongoing, active commissioning by the sender. The one sent carries the sender's identity and authority, much as a shaliach (emissary) in Jewish legal tradition was considered equivalent in legal standing to the person who commissioned him: "the one sent by a man is as the man himself" (Mishnah, Berakhot 5:5). Jesus is invoking precisely this framework, but elevating it to an utterly new theological register.
"Receives me": To receive (lambanō) the sent one is not merely to welcome a messenger — it is to encounter the sender himself. This language of "receiving" carries sacramental overtones throughout John's Gospel: to receive Jesus is to receive life, light, and the power to become children of God (Jn 1:12). Here, "receiving" those Jesus sends participates in that same dynamic.
"And he who receives me, receives him who sent me": The chain is now complete: the sent apostle → Jesus → the Father. This threefold chain of reception is a compressed Trinitarian and missionary theology. The Father's sending of the Son (Jn 3:17; 5:23; 12:44–45) is the model and the source of the Son's sending of the apostles. Those who receive the apostles' witness therefore stand in relationship not merely with human envoys but with the triune God. The parallel in 12:44–45 is nearly verbatim and confirms this is a deliberate Johannine theological motif.