Catholic Commentary
The Jebusites Remain in Jerusalem
63As for the Jebusites, the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the children of Judah couldn’t drive them out; but the Jebusites live with the children of Judah at Jerusalem to this day.
Joshua 15:63 records that the tribe of Judah was unable to drive the Jebusites out of Jerusalem, and the two peoples coexisted in the city. The phrase "to this day" indicates the author wrote during the Judges period or early monarchy, before David's later conquest of the city around 1000 BC.
Jerusalem remained a divided city—the enemy inside the walls—until David came, a shadow of how Christ must conquer the strongholds we tolerate within ourselves.
Catholic tradition illuminates this passage through multiple lenses that are unavailable to a merely historical reading.
The Pattern of Incomplete Holiness. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that even the justified Christian retains concupiscence after Baptism — the inclination toward sin that, though no longer counting as sin itself, remains as "a wound inflicted by sin" (CCC 1264). The Jebusite cohabitation in Jerusalem becomes a striking Old Testament figure for this very reality: the soul has been given its inheritance (grace, the theological virtues, membership in the Body of Christ), yet pockets of the old nature persist, dwelling alongside the new. Holiness, both personal and ecclesial, is always a conquest-in-progress.
Jerusalem as Ecclesial Type. St. Augustine, in The City of God, reads Jerusalem as a type of the Church and the heavenly city. The mixed, still-contested Jerusalem of Joshua 15 prefigures the Church in via — a holy city that is nonetheless inhabited by the imperfect, the lukewarm, and those still enslaved to sin. The full, glorious, and undivided Jerusalem is an eschatological reality (Rev 21:2–3), not yet fully realized in history.
David as Christ-Figure. The resolution of the Jebusite problem arrives not in the book of Joshua but centuries later, when David captures Jerusalem by his own initiative (2 Sam 5:6–9). Patristic commentators, including St. Cyril of Alexandria, read David's capture of Jebus as a type of Christ's conquest of the strongholds of sin and death — what human effort and the old law could not accomplish, the Son of David achieves definitively. The very name "City of David" becomes, in this reading, a type of the Kingdom of Christ.
Spiritual Warfare. Pope Leo XIII's Rerum Novarum and St. Paul VI's Evangelii Nuntiandi both acknowledge that the Christian mission, like Israel's conquest, is never purely external — it always involves an interior battle. The Church's social mission can never be separated from the interior conversion of hearts.
This single verse speaks with startling clarity to the contemporary Catholic who has made sincere commitments of faith — at Confirmation, at a retreat, in a conversion experience — yet finds that certain habitual sins, certain disordered attachments, certain "Jebusites," remain stubbornly entrenched. The spiritual life is not completed in a moment of surrender; it is a prolonged and often painful campaign to bring every "city" of the self under the lordship of Christ.
Practically, this passage invites an examination of conscience not around gross failures but around the persistent, tolerated sin — the habitual pattern of anger in family life, the compromise with pornography or greed, the cynicism that has set up residence alongside genuine faith. These are the Jebusites: not dramatically outside the city walls, but within Jerusalem itself, cohabiting with the holy.
The Catholic response is not despair but sacramental perseverance. Regular Confession is precisely the mechanism by which we continue the conquest — bringing Christ's victory into the specific strongholds that remain. As Origen counsels, we must "strive," we must bring intentional spiritual effort, cooperating with grace rather than settling into a comfortable coexistence with what God has commanded us to cast out.
Commentary
Joshua 15:63 — Literal and Narrative Sense
Joshua 15 concludes the allotment of territory to the tribe of Judah, the largest and most prominent tribe, whose inheritance stretched from the Negev in the south to the environs of Jerusalem in the north. The chapter is largely a catalogue of borders, towns, and villages — a legal-administrative document giving divine sanction to Judah's holdings. Verse 63, therefore, lands with remarkable force precisely because it is an exception, a crack in an otherwise orderly record of possession.
"The Jebusites, the inhabitants of Jerusalem" — the Jebusites were a pre-Israelite Canaanite people (cf. Gen 10:16) who had held the mountain fortress of Jerusalem, also called Jebus (Judg 19:10–11), for centuries. The city sat on a rocky spur known as the City of David, bounded by the Kidron and Hinnom valleys — a natural fortress of considerable strategic strength. The text is precise: these are specifically the inhabitants of Jerusalem, not simply Jebusites living in open country.
"The children of Judah couldn't drive them out" — this is a frank confession of military and spiritual failure. The Hebrew uses the verb yāḵōl (to be able), suggesting not merely a tactical setback but an inability to complete what God had commanded. The Mosaic law had explicitly mandated the complete dispossession of the Canaanite peoples (Deut 7:1–2; 20:17) to prevent Israel from being drawn into idolatry. Judah's failure here is thus not a morally neutral fact of ancient geopolitics; it is a covenant shortfall, echoing the wider pattern of incomplete obedience catalogued in Judges 1 (cf. Judg 1:21, where this same notice appears almost verbatim, attributed there to Benjamin — reflecting a textual tradition acknowledging the city straddled both tribal territories).
"But the Jebusites live with the children of Judah at Jerusalem to this day" — the phrase "to this day" ('ad hayyôm hazzeh) is a historiographic marker signaling that the author is writing from a vantage point when this cohabitation was still observable. This points most likely to the period of the Judges or early monarchy, before David's conquest of Jerusalem around 1000 BC (2 Sam 5:6–9). There is a profound irony here: Jerusalem — the city destined to become the holy city, the seat of the Ark, the place of Solomon's Temple, the site of Christ's Passion, and in typology the image of the heavenly Jerusalem — was still, at this stage, a city of divided loyalties and incomplete holiness.
Typological and Spiritual Senses
The Fathers and the tradition of spiritual exegesis consistently read the Canaanite nations as figures of sin, vice, and disordered passion within the soul of the Christian. Origen, in his , reads the failure to dispossess the Canaanites as a figure of the soul that has received grace but has not yet achieved the complete mortification of its vices: "There are still Jebusites in you, O hearer, unless you strive to cast out every vice from your soul." The Jebusite holdout in Jerusalem is not merely Israel's historical failure — it is the perennial human condition of the soul that has been given the grace of conversion but has not yet fully surrendered every fortress to God. Jerusalem itself, the (city of peace), cannot be a city of true peace while an enemy occupies its heights.