Catholic Commentary
The Parable of the Sower (Part 2)
9He said, “Whoever has ears to hear, let him hear.”
Mark 4:9 concludes the Parable of the Sower with a solemn imperative calling for genuine receptivity to Jesus's teaching. The phrase distinguishes between physical hearing and spiritual comprehension, using the present tense to demand sustained, habitual openness rather than momentary attention, echoing the Old Testament prophetic tradition of Israel's failure to truly hear God's Word.
Hearing is not passive reception but a moral act requiring the whole self — and Jesus is asking whether you'll let yourself be changed by what you receive.
The Anagogical Sense
At the anagogical level, this verse points toward the consummation of all hearing: the beatific vision, wherein the soul hears and becomes the Word fully received. Augustine's restless heart finds its rest not merely in intellectual assent but in the complete interior hearing that is love. The imperative, then, is ultimately eschatological — a foretaste of that final, perfect hearing which constitutes eternal life.
Catholic tradition illuminates this verse with particular richness through its theology of the Word, the fourfold senses of Scripture, and the sacramental life of the Church.
The Catechism and the Hearing of Faith
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "faith is a personal act — the free response of the human person to the initiative of God who reveals himself" (CCC §166). Verse 9 dramatizes precisely this dynamic: God speaks; human freedom must respond. The call to hear is simultaneously an act of grace — the very capacity to hear is a gift — and a demand upon free will. This tension between divine initiative and human response is constitutive of Catholic soteriology.
Augustine on Interior Hearing
St. Augustine, in De Catechizandis Rudibus, distinguishes between those who hear words and those who receive the Word. He insists that fruitful hearing requires humility, the willingness to be soil that accepts being broken up. He draws on this verse frequently in his anti-Donatist writings to argue that the Church's proclamation is always efficacious on God's side; the failure lies entirely in the hardness of the listener's heart.
Origen and the Spiritual Senses
Origen (Commentary on Matthew, drawing on parallel traditions) develops the notion of the "spiritual senses" — that just as the body has physical senses, the soul has corresponding spiritual faculties. To "have ears to hear" is to have the spiritual ear opened by grace, an opening Origen associates with baptismal illumination. This insight was developed further by St. Bonaventure in the Franciscan tradition and remains consonant with the Church's teaching that Baptism configures the believer to receive the Word with new faculties (CCC §1213).
Vatican II: Dei Verbum
The Second Vatican Council's Dei Verbum (§21) teaches that the Church "has always venerated the divine Scriptures just as she venerates the body of the Lord." In the liturgy, hearing the Word proclaimed is not passive reception but an act of worship. Mark 4:9 stands, therefore, as the scriptural charter for the Liturgy of the Word: the faithful are called, Mass after Mass, to hear with ears made receptive by grace and sacrament.
St. John of the Cross and Contemplative Hearing
In the Ascent of Mount Carmel, St. John of the Cross describes the highest form of listening as recogimiento — interior recollection, a silencing of all competing voices so the soul can attend to God alone. This mystical hearing is the full flowering of the imperative Jesus issues here.
For the contemporary Catholic, verse 9 poses an uncomfortably specific question: Am I actually hearing, or merely listening? In an age of information saturation, the liturgical proclamation of Scripture risks becoming ambient noise — words washed over by distraction, scheduling anxiety, or familiarity. Jesus' imperative is an antidote to liturgical passivity.
Concretely, this verse calls Catholics to cultivate what the tradition calls lectio divina — a slow, attentive, prayerful reading of Scripture in which one does not race to comprehend but waits to receive. Before Mass, spending even two minutes reading the day's Gospel passage in silence constitutes an act of preparing the soil. During the Liturgy of the Word, closing one's eyes at the Gospel proclamation and asking, "Lord, what is this Word for me today?" transforms hearing from a passive experience into a personal encounter.
This verse also speaks to the practice of Confession: examining not only what one has done, but what one has refused to hear — the promptings of conscience, the calls to conversion that were ignored or rationalized away. The hardened path, the rocky ground, the thorny ground — each is a failure of hearing. The examination of conscience, properly practiced, is the interior audit that verse 9 demands.
Commentary
Mark 4:9 — "He said, 'Whoever has ears to hear, let him hear.'"
Mark places this declaration as the formal conclusion to the Parable of the Sower (Mk 4:1–9), giving it the weight of a solemn formula. The phrase is not decorative. In the Marcan narrative, it serves as a deliberate hinge between the public parable (vv. 1–9) and its private interpretation for the disciples (vv. 10–20), creating a dramatic tension: those who truly hear will press in to ask for more; those who do not will walk away satisfied with the surface.
The Grammar of the Imperative
The Greek construction is striking: ho echōn ōta akouein, akouetō — literally, "the one having ears to hear, let him hear." The present active imperative akouetō conveys ongoing, habitual action. Jesus is not asking for a single moment of attention but for a sustained posture of receptivity. The participial phrase "having ears to hear" implies that not every person who possesses physical hearing truly hears — a distinction that cuts to the theological heart of the parable itself. This mirrors the Hebrew concept of shema (שְׁמַע), where hearing is inseparable from obeying and responding.
A Prophetic Formula
This formula does not originate with Jesus here; it echoes the prophetic tradition of the Old Testament, where the prophets repeatedly lamented a people who had ears but would not hear (cf. Ezek 12:2; Jer 5:21). Jesus consciously adopts this prophetic register, positioning himself as the eschatological prophet whose Word demands ultimate response. Significantly, the same formula appears in the Book of Revelation addressed to the seven churches (Rev 2–3), linking this moment in Mark to a cosmic dimension of ecclesial accountability.
The Sower and the Soil: What "Hearing" Demands
Within the structure of Mark 4, verse 9 cannot be read in isolation from the parable it concludes. The parable has narrated four kinds of soil — the hardened path, the rocky ground, the thorny ground, and the good earth — each representing not just a kind of person but a quality of hearing. To "have ears to hear" is, therefore, to be the fourth soil: deep, cleared of stones, free of thorns, open to being broken and cultivated. The parable diagnoses; the imperative prescribes. By ending with this call, Jesus implicates every hearer in a choice about which soil they will consent to become.
The Typological Sense
On the typological level, this moment in the field beside the Sea of Galilee recapitulates Israel's fundamental covenant failure — not ignorance of the Law, but refusal to it with the heart. The Shema of Deuteronomy 6:4–5 commands Israel to hear, love, and internalize the Word. Jesus' imperative is the New Covenant renewal of that foundational call, now applied to the Word made flesh. The one who has ears to hear is invited into the New Israel, the Church, where the Word is proclaimed, broken open, and received sacramentally.